当前位置:首页 > 科学研究 > 科技前沿 > 正文内容

DOE Technical Targets for Onboard Hydrogen Storage for Light-Duty Vehicles

RonWang3年前 (2022-02-21)科技前沿648

DOE Technical Targets for Onboard Hydrogen Storage for Light-Duty Vehicles

This table summarizes technical performance targets for hydrogen storage systems onboard light-duty vehicles. These targets were established through the U.S. DRIVE Partnership, a partnership between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Council for Automotive Research (USCAR), energy companies, and utility companies and organizations. View a detailed explanation of these targets and the process used in deriving them.

Hydogen light duty vehicle

More information about targets can be found in the Hydrogen Storage section of the Fuel Cell Technologies Office's Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan.

Technical System Targets: Onboard Hydrogen Storage for Light-Duty Fuel Cell Vehiclesa

STORAGE PARAMETERUNITS20202025ULTIMATE
System Gravimetric Capacity
Usable, specific-energy from H2 (net useful energy/max system mass) bkWh/kg
(kg H2/kg system)
1.5
(0.045)
1.8
(0.055)
2.2
(0.065)
System Volumetric Capacity
Usable energy density from H2 (net useful energy/max system volume) bkWh/L
(kg H2/L system)
1.0
(0.030)
1.3
(0.040)
1.7
(0.050)
Storage System Cost
Storage system cost$/kWh net
($/kg H2)
10
(333)
9
(300)
8
(266)
Fuel cost c$/gge at pump444
Durability/Operability
Operating ambient temperature d°C-40/60 (sun)-40/60 (sun)-40/60 (sun)
Min/max delivery temperature°C-40/85-40/85-40/85
Operational cycle life (1/4 tank to full)cycles1,5001,5001,500
Min delivery pressure from storage systembar (abs)555
Max delivery pressure from storage systembar (abs)121212
Onboard efficiency e%909090
"Well" to power plant efficiency f%606060
Charging/Discharging Rates
System fill time gmin3–53–53–5
Minimum full flow rate (e.g., 1.6 g/s target for 80 kW rated fuel cell power)(g/s)/kW0.020.020.02
Average flow rate(g/s)/kW0.0040.0040.004
Start time to full flow (20°C)s555
Start time to full flow (-20°C)s151515
Transient response at operating temperature 10%–90% and 90%–0% (based on full flow rate)s0.750.750.75
Fuel Quality
Fuel quality (H2 from storage) h% H2Meet or exceed SAE J2719
Dormancy i
Dormancy time target (minimum until first release from initial 95% usable capacity)days71014
Boil-off loss target (max reduction from initial 95% usable capacity after 30 days)%101010
Environmental Health and Safety
Permeation and leakage jMeet or exceed SAE J2579 for system safety
ToxicityMeet or exceed applicable standards
SafetyConduct and evaluate failure analysis

Useful constants: 0.2778 kWh/MJ; Lower heating value for H2 is 33.3 kWh/kg H2; 1 kg H2 ≈ 1 gal gasoline equivalent (gge) on energy basis.

a) For a normalized comparison of system performance to the targets, a usable H2 storage capacity of 5.6 kg H2 should be used at the lower heating value of hydrogen (33.3 kWh/kg H2). Targets are for a complete system, including tank, material, valves, regulators, piping, mounting brackets, insulation, added cooling capacity, and all other balance-of-plant components. All capacities are defined as usable capacities that could be delivered to the fuel cell system. All targets must be met at the end of service life.

b) Capacities are defined as the usable quantity of hydrogen deliverable to the fuel cell system divided by the total mass/volume of the complete storage system, including all stored hydrogen, media, reactants (e.g., water for hydrolysis-based systems), and system components. Capacities must be met at end of service life. Tank designs that are conformable and have the ability to be efficiently packaged on board vehicles may be beneficial even if they do not meet the full volumetric capacity targets.

c) Hydrogen threshold fuel cost is calculated to be competitive with a gasoline hybrid vehicle, and thus is independent of pathway. It is defined as the untaxed cost of hydrogen produced, delivered, and dispensed to the vehicle. For material-based storage technologies, the impact of the technology on the hydrogen threshold fuel cost (e.g., off-board cooling, off-board regeneration of chemical hydrogen storage materials, etc.) must be taken into account.

d) Stated ambient temperature plus full solar load (i.e., full exposure to direct sunlight). No allowable performance degradation from –20ºC to 40ºC. Allowable degradation outside these limits is to be determined.

e) Onboard efficiency is the energy efficiency for delivering hydrogen from the storage system to the fuel cell power plant, i.e., accounting for any energy required operating pumps, blowers, compressors, heating, etc., required for hydrogen release.

f)Well-to-power-plant efficiency includes onboard efficiency plus off-board efficiency, i.e., accounting for the energy efficiency of hydrogen production, delivery, liquefaction, compression, dispensing, regeneration of chemical hydrogen storage materials, etc., as appropriate. H2A and HDSAM analyses should be used for projecting off-board efficiencies. Efficiencies less than the target may be acceptable if evidence can be given that well-to-power-plant carbon intensity (including delivery and dispensing of H2) can achieve less than 5 kg CO2e/kg H2. Argonne National Laboratory’s GREET model should be used to calculate the carbon intensity of well-to-power-plant energy use.

g) When applicable, the fill time should comply with SAE J2601, the Fueling Protocol for Light-Duty Gaseous Hydrogen Surface Vehicles.

h) Hydrogen storage systems must be able to deliver hydrogen that meets acceptable hydrogen quality standards for fuel cell vehicles (see SAE J2719 and ISO/PDTS 14687-2). Note that some storage technologies may produce contaminants for which effects are unknown and not addressed by the published standards; these will be addressed by system engineering design on a case-by-case basis as more information becomes available.

i) Dormancy targets assume vehicle is parked in 35°C ambient temperature and dormancy performance is maintained over the 15-year life of the vehicle.

j) Total hydrogen lost into the environment as H2; relates to hydrogen accumulation in enclosed spaces. Storage systems must comply with applicable standards for vehicular fuel systems including but not limited to SAE J2579 and the United Nations Global Technical Regulation No. 13 (hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles). This includes any coating or enclosure that incorporates the envelope of the storage system.


版权声明:本文为原创文章,版权归donstudio所有,欢迎分享本文,转载请保留出处!

本文链接:http://parentscn.com/?id=136

标签: 氢能汽车

相关文章

RC车模分类 | 平跑和越野各取所需

RC车模分类 | 平跑和越野各取所需

RC模型车跟真实汽车一样,也会根据速度、攀爬能力、越野通过性等分出很多类车型,为便于大家简单、全面了解RC模型车的车型,我们会根据RC模型车的两大家族:越野家族和平跑家族,以图文的方式来向大家介绍。(...

某车型的视野校核分析(职称论文)

某车型的视野校核分析(职称论文)

本论文利用CATIA软件对克莱斯勒J1车型的零部件进行建模和装配;根据GB和SAE的相关方法和标准,采用作图分析法对驾驶员的前方视野和后方视野进行校核。通过作图得出相应的视野范围的数据,按照相关标准给...

RC遥控车模 | 没有相像的那么简单

RC遥控车模 | 没有相像的那么简单

80后是怀旧、新锐的矛盾体。年幼时我怀揣着对汽车的憧憬,晚饭时磨叽一小时只为看一集《高智能方程式》;最开心的是坐在父亲骑着的28大梁上,抱着刚买的四驱车,那高兴劲儿甭提了。随着年龄增长,更...

自动驾驶汽车决策与控制

自动驾驶汽车决策与控制

车辆行为预测:车辆的行驶轨迹是两个因素共同作用的结果,首先是车辆驾驶员的行为,例如反应意图的换道过程;其次是外部环境因素,例如在行驶期间影响车辆轨迹的激发偶同信息(如交通红绿灯)等。...

RC车模结构 | 等比例缩小的高仿真模型

RC车模结构 | 等比例缩小的高仿真模型

可以说,RC模型车是现实汽车的“缩小版”,从外观到轮胎都按照一定比例进行缩放。在RC模型车领域所常见到的车型比例有1:5、1:8、1:10、1:12、1:16、1:18、1:24、1:32等多种选择,...

RC车模动力 | 汽油、甲醇、电池选择多

RC车模动力 | 汽油、甲醇、电池选择多

RC模型车如果按动力来源分类,共分为两种。一种为电动机驱动的电动RC模型车,另一种为二冲程风冷发动机驱动的油动RC模型车,油动车又根据燃料的不同,分为汽油车和甲醇车。我们会根据每种动力的特征、基本配置...

发表评论

访客

看不清,换一张

◎欢迎参与讨论,请在这里发表您的看法和观点。